![]() Let’s chose the first option and see the result. Just use git fetch/status/merge/pull whatever Next time you don’t need to pass everything. Either use git pull, pass everything explicitly to pull command.As we haven’t set any upstream yet, git provides us two options. See, git pull need to know which remote branch it needs to pull data from. Git branch -set-upstream-to =origin/ master If you wish to set tracking information for this branch you can do so with: ![]() Please specify which branch you want to merge with. There is no tracking information for the current branch. Remote: Total 6 (delta 0 ), reused 0 (delta 0 ) Remote: Compressing objects: 100% (3/3 ), done. Let’s use pull to fetch data from remote $ git pull # sync data with remote Newbranch new (next fetch will store in remotes/origin )Įverything is fine till now. Master new (next fetch will store in remotes/origin ) $ cd test # move to newly created repo $ git remote add origin /f/Sandbox/gitdemo/myremote/ # add remote $ git remote show origin # print remote * remote origin Initialized empty Git repository in F:/Sandbox/gitdemo/test/.git/ Say, I have created a new repository and added its origin $ git init test # create a new empty repo Remote branch information is retrieved from its upstream. When these commands are used without any conditional arguments, Setting upstream has effect on many commands e.g. Here master branch is tracking origin/master. Used to print the remote tracking branch. Local branch A and its upstream is set to origin/B, then every push will push the changes to origin/B etc. Every local branch has exactly one upstream set. Upstream is the name of remote branch to which our local branch is synced. To push the current branch and set the remote as upstream, useĮnough is enough, I have searched about it and I am going to write about it. fatal: The current branch master has no upstream branch. I have been digging in configurations and haven’t found anything regarding this option.Whenever I push my newly created local repository to a remote repo, I am prompted with this message. Seeing this dialog is just pure annoyance to me. I push a lot of branches from a lot of different repos to different remote repos. I want to get rid of the additional dialog that asks me to choose an origin from a list that consists of only 1 origin. I want to note that existence of the first dialog (the one that tells me that there is no remote branch) is okay as it was there in the past. Most of my repos have one origin and it is annoying that it asks me which origin to push the branch to with only one option available. If there were two origins, it would ask me which origin to push into.Ĭurrently, when I push a branch to origin, it shows the “origin selector” regardless of the number of origins. When I clicked “Publish” (or whatever the button said), it would immediately create the remote branch in origin and publish to it. If I clicked “push” from within VSCode, it would show a dialog that local branch does not exist in remote and ask me if I should create the branch. ![]() In the past, it didn’t matter where I created the branch from - terminal or within VSCode. However, what I am asking is specifically about how VSCode handles it (and how it used to handle it). What you mentioned is related to GIT in general. Also, VSCode shows different origins if there are more than one origins (if I am not mistaken, it even shows it for fetching from a specific origin). I have checked and there is only one remote repo.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |